My flow for refereeing papers
18/02/2008For some bizarre reason, in the last week I have become very popular as referee for journals, Ph.D. theses and industry reports. I am in need of seriously streamlining my workflow these ‘for the good of science’ type of activities, because I can allocate only a fairly limited time to them. Thus, I need:
- Something that reads PDF documents (all documents that I am receiving come as PDF).
- Hopefully no printing involved, because there is no much point on keeping around copies of draft documents.
- Full screen, so it is easy to read documents and avoids distraction.
- An easy way to keep track of annotations.
- Cheap, remember that this is for the good of humanity.
A quick web search pointed to Skim, which fits the bill in all points (including the last point: free). There are more powerful applications (like the full version of Adobe Acrobat), but I can not see the point of the expense. A nice (30 euros) alternative is Papers, which in addition of facilitating ’studying’ or reading from PDFs, it is quite good at organising PDFs. Last time I checked the program it could only search and import documents from PubMed (in addition to local documents). However, it seems that now it also works with Web of Science (that I use the most), Google Scholar (which I rarely use) and a few others.
So, the way things work now when I am refereeing is:
- PDF is read in Skim.
- Notes are directly inserted in Skim.
- Type my comments to the journal in TextEdit in rich text format (RTF). This is to avoid wasting time tweaking the document. I still used Word for writing papers and reports.
- Print and mail a PDF version to the journal.
And that’s it. It certainly makes things a lot less painful for me.
Filed in productivity, software, writing
No comments yet.